State v. Hicks
909 A.2d 958, 280 Conn. 930
This text of 909 A.2d 958 (State v. Hicks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Hicks, 909 A.2d 958, 280 Conn. 930 (Colo. 2006).
Opinion
STATE of Connecticut
v.
Toren HICKS.
Supreme Court of Connecticut.
Michele C. Lukban, senior assistant state's attorney, in support of the petition.
Mark Rademacher, assistant public defender, in opposition.
The petition by the state of Connecticut for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 97 Conn.App. 266, 903 A.2d 685 (2006), is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Hicks
903 A.2d 685 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2006)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
909 A.2d 958, 280 Conn. 930, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hicks-conn-2006.