State v. Hickman

44 A. 1099, 63 N.J.L. 666, 34 Vroom 666, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 105
CourtSupreme Court of New Jersey
DecidedNovember 20, 1899
StatusPublished

This text of 44 A. 1099 (State v. Hickman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hickman, 44 A. 1099, 63 N.J.L. 666, 34 Vroom 666, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 105 (N.J. 1899).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment in the Supreme Court is affirmed, on the grounds stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Collins.

[667]*667For affirmance — The Chief Justice, Garrison, Lippincott, Gummere, Bogert, Nixon, Hendrickson, Adams, Vredenbujrg-h. 9.

For reversal — None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
44 A. 1099, 63 N.J.L. 666, 34 Vroom 666, 1899 N.J. LEXIS 105, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hickman-nj-1899.