State v. Hickerson
This text of 418 S.W.3d 480 (State v. Hickerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Eric B. Hickerson appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his Motion for Post-Conviction DNA Testing without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. State v. Ruff, 256 S.W.3d 55, 56 (Mo.banc 2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our [481]*481decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
418 S.W.3d 480, 2013 WL 5744507, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hickerson-moctapp-2013.