State v. Hickerson

418 S.W.3d 480, 2013 WL 5744507, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1237
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 22, 2013·No. No. ED 99498·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eric B. Hickerson appeals from the trial court’s judgment denying his Motion for Post-Conviction DNA Testing without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court’s findings of fact and conclusions of law are not clearly erroneous. State v. Ruff, 256 S.W.3d 55, 56 (Mo.banc 2008). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our [481] decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Hickerson, 418 S.W.3d 480, 2013 WL 5744507, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1237 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

418 S.W.3d 480 (State v. Hickerson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Ruff
256 S.W.3d 55 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 2008)