State v. Hice

117 N.C. 782
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided September 15, 1895·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Clark, J.,

“In all cases-a person accused of a crime of any grade, whether a felony or a misdemeanor, has a right to offer in his defense testimony of his good character.” State v. Henry , 50 N. C., 65; State v. Johnson, 60 N. C.. 151; State v. Laxton, 75 N. C., 216; 3 Am. & Eng. Enc., 111. This right is not dependent upon the defendant having been examined as a witness in his own behalf, and was recognized long before defendants were made competent to testify. It is limited to evidence of general character and opens the door, which would be otherwise closed, to the prosecution to show the defendant’s general bad character either by cross examination or by other witnesses. Bex v. Stannard, 7 Carr. & P., 673; 2 Hawkins P. C., Ch. 46, Sec. 194. In excluding the testimony there was error.

Error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Hice, 117 N.C. 782 (N.C. 1895).

117 N.C. 782 (State v. Hice) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Neese v. Utah Bd. of Pardons & Parole
2017 UT 89 (Utah Supreme Court, 2017)
State v. McCray
324 S.E.2d 606 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1985)
State v. Kaiser
494 P.2d 733 (Court of Appeals of Arizona, 1972)
State v. Davis
58 S.E.2d 355 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1950)
Sutherland v. United States
92 F.2d 305 (Fourth Circuit, 1937)