State v. Hibler

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Hibler

518 S.W.3d 902, 2017 WL 2332738, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 511

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedMay 30, 2017

DocketNo. ED 103991

StatusPublished

This text of 518 S.W.3d 902 (State v. Hibler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hibler, 518 S.W.3d 902, 2017 WL 2332738, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 511 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Stephant Hibler appeals the judgment entered on a jury verdict convicting him of three counts of first-degree assault and three counts of armed criminal action. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Stephant Hibler appeals the judgment entered on a jury verdict convicting him of three counts of first-degree assault and three counts of armed criminal action. We find no error has occurred.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

518 S.W.3d 902, 2017 WL 2332738, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 511, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hibler-moctapp-2017.