State v. HIATTE

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. HIATTE

295 S.W.3d 908, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1547, 2009 WL 3592671

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided November 3, 2009·No. WD 70363·Published

Opinion

*909 Order

PER CURIAM.

Donald C. Hiatte appeals from the decision of the Circuit Court of Callaway County finding him guilty of third-degree sexual misconduct. § 566.095 RSMo 2000. In his single point on appeal, Hiatte claims that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for judgment of acquittal because he contends that the State did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that his actions met the elements of third-degree sexual misconduct.

We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*909 Order

PER CURIAM.

Donald C. Hiatte appeals from the decision of the Circuit Court of Callaway County finding him guilty of third-degree sexual misconduct. § 566.095 RSMo 2000. In his single point on appeal, Hiatte claims that the trial court erred in overruling his motion for judgment of acquittal because he contends that the State did not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that his actions met the elements of third-degree sexual misconduct.

We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. HIATTE, 295 S.W.3d 908, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1547, 2009 WL 3592671 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

295 S.W.3d 908 (State v. HIATTE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.