State v. Heywood

541 P.2d 144, 23 Or. App. 163, 1975 Ore. App. LEXIS 914
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedOctober 20, 1975
DocketNo. C-75-04-1253 Cr
StatusPublished

This text of 541 P.2d 144 (State v. Heywood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Heywood, 541 P.2d 144, 23 Or. App. 163, 1975 Ore. App. LEXIS 914 (Or. Ct. App. 1975).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant was convicted of a violation of one of the provisions of ORS ch 481. On appeal the state confesses error, stating:

“Trial court erred in denying defendant’s Motion for Judgment of Acquittal because the statute under which the defendant was charged does not apply to persons who are not engaged in salvage operations.”

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
541 P.2d 144, 23 Or. App. 163, 1975 Ore. App. LEXIS 914, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-heywood-orctapp-1975.