State v. Heyman
847 N.E.2d 1222, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1475
Opinion
Sandusky App. No. S-04-016, 2005-Ohio-5565 and 2005-Ohio-6244. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. It appears from the records of the court that the appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due December 1, 2005, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause is dismissed sua sponte.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Heyman, 847 N.E.2d 1222, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1475 (Ohio 2006).
847 N.E.2d 1222 (State v. Heyman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Heyman, Unpublished Decision (11-22-2005)
2005 Ohio 6244 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)
State v. Heyman, Unpublished Decision (10-14-2005)
2005 Ohio 5565 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2005)