State v. Heyman
This text of 847 N.E.2d 1222 (State v. Heyman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Sandusky App. No. S-04-016, 2005-Ohio-5565 and 2005-Ohio-6244. This cause is pending before the court as a discretionary appeal. It appears from the records of the court that the appellant has not filed a memorandum in support of jurisdiction, due December 1, 2005, in compliance with the Rules of Practice of the Supreme Court and therefore has failed to prosecute this cause with the requisite diligence. Upon consideration thereof,
IT IS ORDERED by the court that this cause is dismissed sua sponte.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
847 N.E.2d 1222, 109 Ohio St. 3d 1475, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-heyman-ohio-2006.