State v. Heupel
This text of 2003 ND 107 (State v. Heupel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 7/16/03 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2003 ND 106__
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Gerald Schmidt, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20020277
Appeal from the District Court of McLean County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Donald L. Jorgensen, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Ladd Ronald Erickson (on brief), State’s Attorney, P.O. Box 1108, Washburn, N.D. 58577-1108, for plaintiff and appellee.
Wayne D. Goter, P.O. Box 1552, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-1552, for defendant and appellant.
State v. Schmidt
[¶1] Gerald Schmidt appealed from a judgment of conviction entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of criminal trespass. Schmidt argues the trial court erred in refusing to admit certain evidence at trial and contends the evidence is insufficient to sustain the verdict. We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3) and (4).
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
William A. Neumann
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2003 ND 107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-heupel-nd-2003.