State v. Hessler

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Hessler

780 N.E.2d 282, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1477

CourtOhio Supreme Court

DecidedDecember 12, 2002

Docket1996-2819

StatusPublished

This text of 780 N.E.2d 282 (State v. Hessler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hessler, 780 N.E.2d 282, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1477 (Ohio 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Franklin C.P. No. 95CR116906. On May 21, 2001, this court stayed the execution of sentence in this cause pending exhaustion of state post-conviction remedies. Appellee has moved that this court set a date for execution of sentence. It appearing to the court that all matters have been disposed of in case No. 1996-2819, appellant’s direct appeal of his conviction, and in case No. 2002-1378, appellant’s post-conviction appeal,

[1478]*1478IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the stay of execution entered in this cause on May 21, 2001, be and is hereby revoked.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED by this court that said sentence be carried into execution by the Warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility or, in his absence, by the Deputy Warden on Tuesday, the 11th day of March, 2003, in accordance with the statutes so provided.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certified copy of this entry and a warrant under the seal of this court be duly certified to the Warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility and that said Warden shall make due return thereof to the Clerk of the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Franklin C.P. No. 95CR116906. On May 21, 2001, this court stayed the execution of sentence in this cause pending exhaustion of state post-conviction remedies. Appellee has moved that this court set a date for execution of sentence. It appearing to the court that all matters have been disposed of in case No. 1996-2819, appellant’s direct appeal of his conviction, and in case No. 2002-1378, appellant’s post-conviction appeal,

[1478]*1478IT IS ORDERED by the court, sua sponte, that the stay of execution entered in this cause on May 21, 2001, be and is hereby revoked.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED by this court that said sentence be carried into execution by the Warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility or, in his absence, by the Deputy Warden on Tuesday, the 11th day of March, 2003, in accordance with the statutes so provided.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a certified copy of this entry and a warrant under the seal of this court be duly certified to the Warden of the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility and that said Warden shall make due return thereof to the Clerk of the Court of Common Pleas of Franklin County.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

780 N.E.2d 282, 97 Ohio St. 3d 1477, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hessler-ohio-2002.