State v. Heselton

67 Me. 598, 1877 Me. LEXIS 110
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided May 31, 1877·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Walton, J.

The plea in abatement is bad for duplicity. It tenders an issue upon at least three separate, distinct and independent propositions of fact. First, it avers that the county of Somerset had not been legally divided into jury districts. Second, that the towns of Anson and Palmyra had in their jury-box more names than the law allows. Third, that in the towns of Madison and St. Albans, no notice of the drawing of the jurors was given. Such a plea is clearly bad. State v. Ward, 68 Maine, 225. State v. Ward, 64 Maine, 545. Bacon’s Abridgment, Abatement, (P). Stephen on Pleading, 253.

Exceptions overruled.

Appleton, C. J., Dickerson, Barrows, Danfokth and Peters, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Heselton, 67 Me. 598, 1877 Me. LEXIS 110 (Me. 1877).

67 Me. 598 (State v. Heselton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Boynton
62 A.2d 182 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1948)
United States v. Richardson
28 F. 61 (U.S. Circuit Court, 1886)