State v. Herron

Supreme Court of Missouri

State v. Herron

37 S.W. 1131, 136 Mo. 292, 1896 Mo. LEXIS 326

DecidedDecember 1, 1896

StatusPublished

This text of 37 S.W. 1131 (State v. Herron) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Herron, 37 S.W. 1131, 136 Mo. 292, 1896 Mo. LEXIS 326 (Mo. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

Oantt, P. J.

Thedefendant was indicted in the St. Louis criminal court, duly arraigned and convicted of grand larceny and his punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary. He appeals but has filed no exceptions. We are remitted to an examination of the record proper to ascertain what, if any, error was com-mitted to his prejudice in the St. Louis criminal court. A critical examination discloses no error or irregularity whatever in the proceedings and the judgment is accordingly affirmed.

Sherwood and Burgess, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oantt, P. J.

Thedefendant was indicted in the St. Louis criminal court, duly arraigned and convicted of grand larceny and his punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary. He appeals but has filed no exceptions. We are remitted to an examination of the record proper to ascertain what, if any, error was com-mitted to his prejudice in the St. Louis criminal court. A critical examination discloses no error or irregularity whatever in the proceedings and the judgment is accordingly affirmed.

Sherwood and Burgess, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

37 S.W. 1131, 136 Mo. 292, 1896 Mo. LEXIS 326, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-herron-mo-1896.