State v. Herron

Supreme Court of Missouri

State v. Herron

37 S.W. 1131, 136 Mo. 292, 1896 Mo. LEXIS 326

Supreme Court of Missouri·Decided December 1, 1896·Published

Opinion

Oantt, P. J.

Thedefendant was indicted in the St. Louis criminal court, duly arraigned and convicted of grand larceny and his punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary. He appeals but has filed no exceptions. We are remitted to an examination of the record proper to ascertain what, if any, error was com-mitted to his prejudice in the St. Louis criminal court. A critical examination discloses no error or irregularity whatever in the proceedings and the judgment is accordingly affirmed.

Sherwood and Burgess, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Oantt, P. J.

Thedefendant was indicted in the St. Louis criminal court, duly arraigned and convicted of grand larceny and his punishment assessed at two years in the penitentiary. He appeals but has filed no exceptions. We are remitted to an examination of the record proper to ascertain what, if any, error was com-mitted to his prejudice in the St. Louis criminal court. A critical examination discloses no error or irregularity whatever in the proceedings and the judgment is accordingly affirmed.

Sherwood and Burgess, JJ., concur.

State v. Herron, 37 S.W. 1131, 136 Mo. 292, 1896 Mo. LEXIS 326 (Mo. 1896).

Pincite

37 S.W. 1131 (State v. Herron) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.