State v. Herrod

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Herrod

294 S.W.3d 140, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1504, 2009 WL 3260081

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 13, 2009

DocketED 91879

StatusPublished

This text of 294 S.W.3d 140 (State v. Herrod) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Herrod, 294 S.W.3d 140, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1504, 2009 WL 3260081 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Vestor Herrod appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of forcible rape, Section 566.030 RSMo 2000, attempted forcible sodomy, Section 566.060 RSMo 2000, and first-degree burglary, Section 569.160 RSMo 2000. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, *141 for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Vestor Herrod appeals from the judgment entered on a jury verdict finding him guilty of forcible rape, Section 566.030 RSMo 2000, attempted forcible sodomy, Section 566.060 RSMo 2000, and first-degree burglary, Section 569.160 RSMo 2000. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. We have furnished the parties with a memorandum, *141 for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision. We affirm. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

294 S.W.3d 140, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1504, 2009 WL 3260081, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-herrod-moctapp-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack