State v. Herrington

21 Ark. 195
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedJanuary 15, 1860
StatusPublished

This text of 21 Ark. 195 (State v. Herrington) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Herrington, 21 Ark. 195 (Ark. 1860).

Opinion

Mr. Justice Compton

delivered the opinion of the Court.

The defendant, Herrington, was indicted in the Crawford Circuit Court for an assault and battery upon one West.

At the trial the defendant was acquitted, and the case comes before us on exceptions taken to the decision of the court overruling the State’s motion for a new trial.

The only question presented for our determination is, whether the verdict of the jury was warranted by the testimony.

It appears that West, the party injured, in a spirit of jest, indulged in pranks and vulgar language, which were offensive and annoying to the defendant, who, in consequence thereof, became exasperated, and inflicted a severe blow upon West with an iron wedge.

Although the language and deportment of West, as stated in the bill of exceptions, were in the highest degree reprehensible, and well calculated to provoke violence on the part of the defendant, who was quite an old man. yet they did not justify an assault, and could only be considered by the jury in mitigation of the fine.

There being no evidence whatever, as appears by the record, to support the finding of the jury, the judgment must be reversed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
21 Ark. 195, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-herrington-ark-1860.