State v. Herring
984 P.2d 954, 163 Or. App. 117, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1594
This text of 984 P.2d 954 (State v. Herring) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. Herring, 984 P.2d 954, 163 Or. App. 117, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1594 (Or. Ct. App. 1999).
Opinion
At oral argument, the state conceded that none of the alleged predicate offenses could be used to support the racketeering conviction. See State v. Harris, 157 Or App 119, 967 P2d 909 (1998). We accept the state’s concession.
Reversed and remanded with instructions to vacate judgment.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Harris
967 P.2d 909 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1998)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
984 P.2d 954, 163 Or. App. 117, 1999 Ore. App. LEXIS 1594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-herring-orctapp-1999.