State v. Herrin
This text of 718 S.E.2d 152 (State v. Herrin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
STATE of North Carolina
v.
Tony Allen HERRIN.
Supreme Court of North Carolina.
Michael Casterline, Asheville, for Herrin, Tony Allen.
Barry H. Bloch, Assistant Attorney General, for State of N.C.
Locke Bell, District Attorney, for State of N.C.
ORDER
Upon consideration of the notice of appeal from the North Carolina Court of Appeals, filed by the Defendant on the 19th of July 2011 in this matter pursuant to G.S. 7A-30, and the motion to dismiss the appeal for lack of substantial constitutional question filed by the State of NC, the following order was entered and is hereby certified to the North Carolina Court of Appeals: the motion to dismiss the appeal is
"Allowed by order of the Court in conference, this the 6th of October 2011."
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
718 S.E.2d 152, 365 N.C. 351, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-herrin-nc-2011.