State v. Herrera-Cruz

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Herrera-Cruz

136 P.3d 73, 206 Or. App. 231, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 728

CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon

DecidedMay 31, 2006

DocketC033214CR; A124600

StatusPublished

This text of 136 P.3d 73 (State v. Herrera-Cruz) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Herrera-Cruz, 136 P.3d 73, 206 Or. App. 231, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 728 (Or. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for two counts of felony fourth-degree assault. ORS 163.160. He asserts that the trial court erred in failing to merge the convictions. The state concedes that the trial court erred in failing to merge the convictions into a single conviction. We agree and accept the concession. State v. Glaspey, 337 Or 558, 567, 100 P3d 730 (2004).

Convictions vacated and remanded for merger and for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for two counts of felony fourth-degree assault. ORS 163.160. He asserts that the trial court erred in failing to merge the convictions. The state concedes that the trial court erred in failing to merge the convictions into a single conviction. We agree and accept the concession. State v. Glaspey, 337 Or 558, 567, 100 P3d 730 (2004).

Convictions vacated and remanded for merger and for resentencing; otherwise affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

136 P.3d 73, 206 Or. App. 231, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 728, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-herrera-cruz-orctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack