State v. Hernandez
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports.
Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO, 3 Plaintiff-Appellee, 4 v. NO. 32,727 5 ALBERT HERNANDEZ, 6 Defendant-Appellant.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF LEA COUNTY 8 Gary L. Clingman, District Judge
9 Gary K. King, Attorney General 10 Santa Fe, NM
11 Max De Azevedo 12 Hobbs, NM
13 for Appellee
14 Templeman & Crutchfield, PA 15 C. Barry Crutchfield 16 Lovington, NM
17 for Appellant
1 MEMORANDUM OPINION 2 WECHSLER, Judge. 3 {1} Summary affirmance was proposed for the reasons stated in the notice of 4 proposed summary disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has 5 been filed and the time for doing so has expired. 6 {2} Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated in our calendar notice. 7 {3} IT IS SO ORDERED.
8 __________________________________ 9 JAMES J. WECHSLER, Judge
10 WE CONCUR:
11 _________________________________ 12 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
13 _________________________________ 14 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Hernandez (State v. Hernandez) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.