State v. Hernandez-Montesino

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Hernandez-Montesino

579 S.W.3d 929

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedAugust 20, 2019

DocketWD 80946

StatusPublished

This text of 579 S.W.3d 929 (State v. Hernandez-Montesino) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hernandez-Montesino, 579 S.W.3d 929 (Mo. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam

Following a jury trial, Manuel Hernandez-Montesino appeals from his conviction on one count of second-degree domestic assault. He contends the circuit court erred in prohibiting defense counsel from making comments during closing arguments about the State's failure to present certain evidence at trial. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the *930parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam

Following a jury trial, Manuel Hernandez-Montesino appeals from his conviction on one count of second-degree domestic assault. He contends the circuit court erred in prohibiting defense counsel from making comments during closing arguments about the State's failure to present certain evidence at trial. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the *930parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction. Rule 30.25(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

579 S.W.3d 929, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hernandez-montesino-moctapp-2019.