State v. Hernandez-Madrid

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. Hernandez-Madrid

646 S.E.2d 105, 361 N.C. 421

CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina

DecidedJune 28, 2007

DocketNo. 534PA05.

StatusPublished

This text of 646 S.E.2d 105 (State v. Hernandez-Madrid) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hernandez-Madrid, 646 S.E.2d 105, 361 N.C. 421 (N.C. 2007).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

To the extent the Court of Appeals ordered remand of defendant's case for resentencing, we reverse and remand to that court for reconsideration in light of State v. Hurt, 361 N.C. 325, 643 S.E.2d 915, (2007), and State v. Blackwell, 361 N.C. 41, 638 S.E.2d 452 (2006), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 127 S.Ct. 2281, ___ L.Ed.2d ___ 75 U.S.L.W. 3609 (2007). The Court of Appeals opinion remains undisturbed in all other respects.

REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

Justice HUDSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

To the extent the Court of Appeals ordered remand of defendant's case for resentencing, we reverse and remand to that court for reconsideration in light of State v. Hurt, 361 N.C. 325, 643 S.E.2d 915, (2007), and State v. Blackwell, 361 N.C. 41, 638 S.E.2d 452 (2006), cert. denied, ___ U.S. ___, 127 S.Ct. 2281, ___ L.Ed.2d ___ 75 U.S.L.W. 3609 (2007). The Court of Appeals opinion remains undisturbed in all other respects.

REVERSED IN PART AND REMANDED.

Justice HUDSON did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

646 S.E.2d 105, 361 N.C. 421, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hernandez-madrid-nc-2007.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack