State v. Hernandez

706 So. 2d 66, 1998 WL 51374
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 11, 1998
Docket96-02300
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 706 So. 2d 66 (State v. Hernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hernandez, 706 So. 2d 66, 1998 WL 51374 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

Opinion

706 So.2d 66 (1998)

STATE of Florida, Appellant,
v.
Lucio HERNANDEZ, Appellee.

No. 96-02300.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

February 11, 1998.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee and Helene S. Parnes, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

No appearance for Appellee.

FRANK, Acting Chief Judge.

The State appeals from an order suppressing marijuana and brass knuckles found on Lucio Hernandez's person. We reverse; the police officers had probable cause to arrest and search Hernandez.

Immediately prior to Hernandez's arrest, Detective Sposato and Officer Waiters were on patrol at the county fair. While driving with the car windows down, the officers passed a large group. They smelled a strong odor of marijuana emanating from the cluster of people. The officers stopped their vehicle, exited and approached the group. The odor became stronger as they neared the people. When the officers approached, Hernandez started to walk away. Detective Sposato told Hernandez that he wanted to talk to him, but Hernandez continued on his way. When the detective caught up with him, he again noticed the odor of marijuana. Detective Sposato asked Hernandez if he could search him, and Hernandez consented. During a pat-down, the officer felt what he believed to be a firearm, but it turned out to be brass knuckles. Detective Sposato again searched Hernandez and found marijuana. Detective Sposato testified at the suppression hearing that he was trained to recognize *67 the distinctive odor of marijuana and has smelled marijuana residue numerous times.

The odor of marijuana gave the officers probable cause to believe the members of the group had marijuana in their possession and, therefore, to search each person who was present. See State v. Wynn, 623 So.2d 848 (Fla. 2d DCA 1993). See also State v. T.T., 594 So.2d 839 (Fla. 5th DCA 1992). Furthermore, a search incident to a lawful arrest can precede the arrest if the officer has probable cause to arrest the defendant prior to the search. See Baggett v. State, 562 So.2d 359 (Fla. 2d DCA 1990).

The officers observed Hernandez as a member of the group from which the odor of marijuana emanated and, on that basis, had probable cause to stop and search him. Accordingly, the trial court erred in granting Hernandez's motion to suppress.

Reversed.

FULMER and NORTHCUTT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

STATE OF FLORIDA v. SEBASTION TIGNER
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019
State v. J.J., a child
143 So. 3d 1050 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
D.H. v. State
121 So. 3d 76 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)
A.T. v. State
93 So. 3d 1159 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2012)
Bunch v. Commonwealth
658 S.E.2d 724 (Court of Appeals of Virginia, 2008)
State v. Jennings
968 So. 2d 694 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
Mincey v. State
949 So. 2d 320 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)
S.B. v. State
898 So. 2d 274 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
State v. Yates
589 S.E.2d 902 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)
STATE, DEPT. OF HWY. SAF. AND MOTOR VEHICLES v. Whitley
846 So. 2d 1163 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
State v. T.P.
835 So. 2d 1277 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
State v. Steelman
125 S.W.3d 447 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2003)
Green v. State
831 So. 2d 1243 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Williams v. State
731 So. 2d 48 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
706 So. 2d 66, 1998 WL 51374, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hernandez-fladistctapp-1998.