State v. Herbel
This text of 2008 ND 63 (State v. Herbel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Filed 4/17/08 by Clerk of Supreme Court
IN THE SUPREME COURT
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2008 ND 63
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee
v.
Bobi Jo Herbel, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20070344
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Robert O. Wefald, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Brandi Sasse Russell, Assistant State’s Attorney, Courthouse, 514 East Thayer Avenue, Bismarck, N.D. 58501-4413, for plaintiff and appellee.
Justin D. Roness, 721 Memorial Highway, P.O. Box 4252, Bismarck, N.D. 58502-4252, for defendant and appellant.
State v. Herbel
[¶1] Bobi Jo Herbel appeals the judgment of the district court entered after she conditionally pled guilty to possession of marijuana by an operator of a motor vehicle, reserving the right to appeal the district court’s refusal to suppress evidence in her case. Herbel argues law enforcement lacked reasonable and articulable suspicion to stop the vehicle she was driving. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3), concluding there was reasonable and articulable suspicion to stop the vehicle.
[¶2] Gerald W. VandeWalle, C.J.
Dale V. Sandstrom
Daniel J. Crothers
Mary Muehlen Maring
Carol Ronning Kapsner
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2008 ND 63, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-herbel-nd-2008.