State v. Henson

Supreme Court of Missouri

State v. Henson

496 S.W.2d 817, 1973 Mo. LEXIS 890

CourtSupreme Court of Missouri

DecidedJuly 16, 1973

DocketNo. 57270

StatusPublished

This text of 496 S.W.2d 817 (State v. Henson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Henson, 496 S.W.2d 817, 1973 Mo. LEXIS 890 (Mo. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Defendant appeals from a conviction for first degree robbery after a jury trial and a sentence of 15 years imprisonment. The offense occurred in Jackson County on July 25, 1970, robbery of a liquor store known as Big Daddy’s. This court has jurisdiction, as the appeal was pending here on January 1, 1972, the effective date of the amendment to the judicial article of the constitution.

This appeal docs not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury verdict. Study of the transcript and the briefs shows no error of law. The points relied on raise no unusual or unsettled questions and an opinion in this case would have no precedential value. Therefore, we affirm by memorandum opinion, rule 84.16(b), V.A.M.R.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Defendant appeals from a conviction for first degree robbery after a jury trial and a sentence of 15 years imprisonment. The offense occurred in Jackson County on July 25, 1970, robbery of a liquor store known as Big Daddy’s. This court has jurisdiction, as the appeal was pending here on January 1, 1972, the effective date of the amendment to the judicial article of the constitution.

This appeal docs not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence to support the jury verdict. Study of the transcript and the briefs shows no error of law. The points relied on raise no unusual or unsettled questions and an opinion in this case would have no precedential value. Therefore, we affirm by memorandum opinion, rule 84.16(b), V.A.M.R.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

496 S.W.2d 817, 1973 Mo. LEXIS 890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-henson-mo-1973.