State v. Hensley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

State v. Hensley

196 S.E.2d 417, 18 N.C. App. 348, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1871

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Hensley. Read the opinion of the Court — 29 N.C. App. 8 →

Court of Appeals of North Carolina·Decided May 23, 1973·No. No. 7328SC334·Published

Opinion

CAMPBELL, Judge.

Defendant having brought forward no assignments of error, the appeal requires review of the record proper only. Defendant was charged and tried on a valid bill, of indictment, the jury verdict is proper, and supports the judgment of the court. Defendant was sentenced to a term of imprisonment within that allowed by statute.

Defendant has had a fair trial free from prejudicial error.

Affirmed.

Judges Britt and Hedrick concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CAMPBELL, Judge.

Defendant having brought forward no assignments of error, the appeal requires review of the record proper only. Defendant was charged and tried on a valid bill, of indictment, the jury verdict is proper, and supports the judgment of the court. Defendant was sentenced to a term of imprisonment within that allowed by statute.

Defendant has had a fair trial free from prejudicial error.

Affirmed.

Judges Britt and Hedrick concur.

State v. Hensley, 196 S.E.2d 417, 18 N.C. App. 348, 1973 N.C. App. LEXIS 1871 (N.C. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

196 S.E.2d 417 (State v. Hensley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.