State v. . Hensley

Supreme Court of North Carolina

State v. . Hensley

132 S.E. 927, 191 N.C. 829, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 199

DecidedMay 12, 1926

StatusPublished

This text of 132 S.E. 927 (State v. . Hensley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. . Hensley, 132 S.E. 927, 191 N.C. 829, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 199 (N.C. 1926).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The evidence is conflicting on the issue of guilt; it is purely a question of fact; the jury has determined the matter against the defendant; there is no reversible error appearing on the record; the exceptions relating to the admission and exclusion of evidence, and those to the charge, must all be resolved in favot of the validity- of the trial; the case presents no new question of law, or one not heretofore settled by our decisions; the verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The evidence is conflicting on the issue of guilt; it is purely a question of fact; the jury has determined the matter against the defendant; there is no reversible error appearing on the record; the exceptions relating to the admission and exclusion of evidence, and those to the charge, must all be resolved in favot of the validity- of the trial; the case presents no new question of law, or one not heretofore settled by our decisions; the verdict and judgment will be upheld.

No error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

132 S.E. 927, 191 N.C. 829, 1926 N.C. LEXIS 199, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hensley-nc-1926.