State v. Henry

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Henry

165 S.W.3d 498, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 609, 2005 WL 947127

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 26, 2005·No. No. ED 84803·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Emile Henry (“defendant”) appeals the judgment on his conviction of two counts of robbery in the first degree. Defendant claims that the trial court erred in allowing certain closing argument by the prosecutor, and in allowing evidence of defendant’s uncharged misconduct.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Emile Henry (“defendant”) appeals the judgment on his conviction of two counts of robbery in the first degree. Defendant claims that the trial court erred in allowing certain closing argument by the prosecutor, and in allowing evidence of defendant’s uncharged misconduct.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Henry, 165 S.W.3d 498, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 609, 2005 WL 947127 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

165 S.W.3d 498 (State v. Henry) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related