State v. Henry

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Henry

165 S.W.3d 498, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 609, 2005 WL 947127

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 26, 2005

DocketNo. ED 84803

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 165 S.W.3d 498 (State v. Henry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Henry, 165 S.W.3d 498, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 609, 2005 WL 947127 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Emile Henry (“defendant”) appeals the judgment on his conviction of two counts of robbery in the first degree. Defendant claims that the trial court erred in allowing certain closing argument by the prosecutor, and in allowing evidence of defendant’s uncharged misconduct.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment of the trial court is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI