State v. Henry

Louisiana Court of Appeal

State v. Henry

802 So. 2d 1021, 2001 La.App. 4 Cir. 0333, 2002 La. App. LEXIS 19, 2002 WL 46945

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedJanuary 9, 2002

DocketNo. 2001-KA-0333

StatusPublished

This text of 802 So. 2d 1021 (State v. Henry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Henry, 802 So. 2d 1021, 2001 La.App. 4 Cir. 0333, 2002 La. App. LEXIS 19, 2002 WL 46945 (La. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

STEVEN R. PLOTKIN, Judge.

On rehearing we vacate the previous decree and reverse the ruling of the trial court. When the entirety of the evidence, including inadmissible evidence which was erroneously admitted, is insufficient to support the conviction, the accused must be discharged as to that crime, and any discussion by the court of the trial error issues as to that crime would be pure dicta since those issues are moot. State v. Hearold, 603 So.2d 731, 734 (La.1992). Looking at the evidence and testimony in the instant case we find that the State did not produce sufficient evidence to sustain a conviction for attempted stalking.

For the reasons stated above the previous decree of this Court in the above captioned matter is vacated and the defendant’s conviction and sentence are reversed.

PREVIOUS DECREE VACATED; REVERSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

STEVEN R. PLOTKIN, Judge.

On rehearing we vacate the previous decree and reverse the ruling of the trial court. When the entirety of the evidence, including inadmissible evidence which was erroneously admitted, is insufficient to support the conviction, the accused must be discharged as to that crime, and any discussion by the court of the trial error issues as to that crime would be pure dicta since those issues are moot. State v. Hearold, 603 So.2d 731, 734 (La.1992). Looking at the evidence and testimony in the instant case we find that the State did not produce sufficient evidence to sustain a conviction for attempted stalking.

For the reasons stated above the previous decree of this Court in the above captioned matter is vacated and the defendant’s conviction and sentence are reversed.

PREVIOUS DECREE VACATED; REVERSED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

802 So. 2d 1021, 2001 La.App. 4 Cir. 0333, 2002 La. App. LEXIS 19, 2002 WL 46945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-henry-lactapp-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack