State v. Henley

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Henley. Read the opinion of the Court — 136 Haw. 471
Hawaii Supreme Court·Decided June 3, 2015·No. SCWC-13-0005595·Published

Opinion

Electronically Filed

Supreme Court

SCWC-13-0005595

03-JUN-2015

08:18 AM

SCWC-13-0005595

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I

STATE OF HAWAI#I, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

JONATHAN HENLEY, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-13-0005595; CR. NO. 13-1-0635)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Jonathan Henley’s application for writ of certiorari filed on April 17, 2015, is hereby accepted.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawai#i Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.

DATED: Honolulu, Hawai#i, June 3, 2015.

Shawn A. Luiz for petitioner /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald

/s/ Paula A. Nakayama

/s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Henley, (haw 2015).

State v. Henley (State v. Henley) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.