State v. Hendrickson

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Hendrickson

294 S.W.3d 137, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1482, 2009 WL 3259999

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided October 13, 2009·No. ED 92247·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

*138 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Jason Hendrickson, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County following his conviction by a jury of four counts of first-degree statutory sodomy, in violation of section 566.062 RSMo. (Supp.2008). Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*138 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

The defendant, Jason Hendrickson, appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County following his conviction by a jury of four counts of first-degree statutory sodomy, in violation of section 566.062 RSMo. (Supp.2008). Finding no error, we affirm.

We have reviewed the parties’ briefs and the record on appeal. An opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order.

We affirm the trial court’s judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Hendrickson, 294 S.W.3d 137, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1482, 2009 WL 3259999 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

294 S.W.3d 137 (State v. Hendrickson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related