Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Henderson

State v. Henderson

611 N.E.2d 322, 66 Ohio St. 3d 1219, 1993 Ohio LEXIS 906
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Henderson. Read the opinion of the Court — 65 Ohio St. 3d 1441 →
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided May 12, 1993·No. No. 92-1004·Published

Opinion

The appeal and cross-appeal are dismissed, sua sponte, as having been improvidently allowed.

A.W. Sweeney, Douglas, Wright, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney and Pfeifer, JJ., concur. Moyer, C.J., dissents, and would affirm on the issue of murder, but would reverse on the issue of forgery and tampering with records.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Henderson, 611 N.E.2d 322, 66 Ohio St. 3d 1219, 1993 Ohio LEXIS 906 (Ohio 1993).

611 N.E.2d 322 (State v. Henderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.