State v. Henderson
This text of 354 Mont. 30 (State v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Montana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On November 25, 2008, the defendant was sentenced to five (5) years in the Montana State Prison, for violation of the conditions of a suspended sentence, for the offense of Failure of Violent Offender to [31]*31Provide Notice of Address Change, a felony. The Court recommended that he be re-evaluated for chemical dependency, and if indicated, that he be phased into Coxmections-Corrections at some point.
On May 7, 2009, the defendant’s application for review of that sentence was heard by the Sentence Review Division of the Montana Supreme Court.
The defendant was present and was represented by Eric Olson. The state was not represented.
Before hearing the application, the defendant was advised that the Sentence Review Division has the authority not only to reduce the sentence or affirm it, but also increase it. The defendant was further advised that there is no appeal from a decision of the Sentence Review Division. The defendant acknowledged that he understood this and stated that he wished to proceed.
Rule 17 of the Rules of the Sentence Review Division of the Supreme Court of Montana provides that “the sentence imposed by the District Court is presumed correct, and the sentence will not be reduced or increased unless it is deemed clearly inadequate or excessive.” (§46-18-904(3), MCA).
The Division finds that the reasons advanced for modification are insufficient to hold that the sentence imposed by the District Court is inadequate or excessive.
Therefore, it is the unanimous decision of the Sentence Review Division that the sentence shall be affirmed.
Done in open Court this 7th day of May, 2009.
DATED this 21st day of May, 2009.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
354 Mont. 30, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-henderson-mont-2009.