State v. Henderson

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Henderson

341 S.W.3d 862, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 747, 2011 WL 2118796

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Henderson. Read the opinion of the Court — 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 756 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 31, 2011·No. WD 71481·Published

Opinion

*863 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terrance Henderson appeals his convictions of one count of armed robbery and one count of armed criminal action. Henderson argues: that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions; that his right to testify was violated when the trial court refused to allow him to revoke his explicit waiver of that right; and that he was denied a fair trial by the prosecutor’s alleged misstatement of the evidence during closing argument. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 80.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*863 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Terrance Henderson appeals his convictions of one count of armed robbery and one count of armed criminal action. Henderson argues: that the evidence was insufficient to support his convictions; that his right to testify was violated when the trial court refused to allow him to revoke his explicit waiver of that right; and that he was denied a fair trial by the prosecutor’s alleged misstatement of the evidence during closing argument. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order has been provided to the parties. Rule 80.25(b).

State v. Henderson, 341 S.W.3d 862, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 747, 2011 WL 2118796 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

341 S.W.3d 862 (State v. Henderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.