State v. Henderson

104 So. 3d 560, 2012 La.App. 4 Cir. 1104, 2012 WL 5458063, 2012 La. App. LEXIS 1429
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Henderson. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 La.App. 4 Cir. 0526
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided November 5, 2012·No. No. 2012-K-1104·Published

Opinions

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

PAUL A. BONIN, Judge.

hOn September 7, 2012, we granted the prosecution’s writ application, noting “The trial judge’s ruling, however, that the fact the defendant pled guilty to the 1999 robberies was inadmissible is in error.” Judge McKay, however, dissented, and Mr. Henderson, the defendant, on September 19, 2012, timely filed an application for rehearing.

We now grant the application for rehearing, and set aside our writ grant of September 7, 2012. We also now deny the prosecution’s application, which was filed [561]*561on July 25, 2012. Thus, the ruling of Judge Zibilich about which the prosecution sought review is restored.

REHEARING GRANTED; WRIT DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Henderson, 104 So. 3d 560, 2012 La.App. 4 Cir. 1104, 2012 WL 5458063, 2012 La. App. LEXIS 1429 (La. Ct. App. 2012).

104 So. 3d 560 (State v. Henderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Prieur
277 So. 2d 126 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1973)
State v. Lawrence
47 So. 3d 1003 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2010)