State v. Henderson

104 So. 3d 560, 2012 La.App. 4 Cir. 1104, 2012 WL 5458063, 2012 La. App. LEXIS 1429
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedNovember 5, 2012
DocketNo. 2012-K-1104
StatusPublished

This text of 104 So. 3d 560 (State v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Henderson, 104 So. 3d 560, 2012 La.App. 4 Cir. 1104, 2012 WL 5458063, 2012 La. App. LEXIS 1429 (La. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinions

ON APPLICATION FOR REHEARING

PAUL A. BONIN, Judge.

hOn September 7, 2012, we granted the prosecution’s writ application, noting “The trial judge’s ruling, however, that the fact the defendant pled guilty to the 1999 robberies was inadmissible is in error.” Judge McKay, however, dissented, and Mr. Henderson, the defendant, on September 19, 2012, timely filed an application for rehearing.

We now grant the application for rehearing, and set aside our writ grant of September 7, 2012. We also now deny the prosecution’s application, which was filed [561]*561on July 25, 2012. Thus, the ruling of Judge Zibilich about which the prosecution sought review is restored.

REHEARING GRANTED; WRIT DENIED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Prieur
277 So. 2d 126 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1973)
State v. Lawrence
47 So. 3d 1003 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
104 So. 3d 560, 2012 La.App. 4 Cir. 1104, 2012 WL 5458063, 2012 La. App. LEXIS 1429, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-henderson-lactapp-2012.