State v. Henderson

875 So. 2d 797, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8926, 2004 WL 1415464
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 25, 2004
DocketNo. 2D03-1353
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 875 So. 2d 797 (State v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Henderson, 875 So. 2d 797, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8926, 2004 WL 1415464 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

SILBERMAN, Judge.

Based on this court’s recent opinion in Maddox v. State, 862 So.2d 783 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003) (certifying conflict with Dixon v. State, 812 So.2d 595 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)), we grant the State’s petition for writ of certiorari and quash the trial court’s order in limine which prohibits the State from introducing a traffic citation, or any evidence referring to the citation, into evidence at Kimberly Henderson’s forgery trial.

Petition granted and order quashed.

ALTENBERND, C.J., and KELLY, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MARTIN MEM. MED. CENTER, INC. v. Tenet Healthsystem Hospitals, Inc.
875 So. 2d 797 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
875 So. 2d 797, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 8926, 2004 WL 1415464, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-henderson-fladistctapp-2004.