State v. Henderson

173 A.3d 389, 326 Conn. 914, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 218
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedJune 28, 2017
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 173 A.3d 389 (State v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Henderson, 173 A.3d 389, 326 Conn. 914, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 218 (Colo. 2017).

Opinion

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 173 Conn. App. 119, 163 A.3d 74 (2017), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant's sentence was not illegal, does not violate the double jeopardy clause, and does not run contrary to legislative intent?"

ESPINOSA, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Henderson
201 A.3d 389 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2019)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
173 A.3d 389, 326 Conn. 914, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-henderson-conn-2017.