State v. Henderson

Supreme Court of Connecticut

State v. Henderson

173 A.3d 389, 326 Conn. 914, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 218

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided June 28, 2017·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 173 Conn. App. 119, 163 A.3d 74 (2017), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant's sentence was not illegal, does not violate the double jeopardy clause, and does not run contrary to legislative intent?"

ESPINOSA, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendant's petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 173 Conn. App. 119, 163 A.3d 74 (2017), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the defendant's sentence was not illegal, does not violate the double jeopardy clause, and does not run contrary to legislative intent?"

ESPINOSA, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

State v. Henderson, 173 A.3d 389, 326 Conn. 914, 2017 Conn. LEXIS 218 (Colo. 2017).

Pincite

173 A.3d 389 (State v. Henderson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related