State v. Hempel

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Hempel

169 N.W.2d 56, 284 Minn. 534, 1969 Minn. LEXIS 1085

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJune 20, 1969

DocketNo. 41117

StatusPublished

This text of 169 N.W.2d 56 (State v. Hempel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hempel, 169 N.W.2d 56, 284 Minn. 534, 1969 Minn. LEXIS 1085 (Mich. 1969).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Appeal from a judgment of conviction based upon defendant’s plea of guilty to the crime of robbery.

It is urged in this court that the plea of guilty should not have been accepted because it was not voluntary and defendant was not mentally competent to interpose the plea.

Because there is no support in the record for these claims, the conviction must be affirmed. State v. Taylor, 283 Minn. 226, 167 N. W. (2d) 138.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI