State v. Helton
369 A.2d 10, 72 N.J. 169, 1977 N.J. LEXIS 232
Opinion
The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed in the opinion of the Appellate Division.
For affirmance — Justices Mountain, Sullivan, Pashman and Clieeobd and Judges Cabton and Halpeen — 6.
For reversal — None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Helton, 369 A.2d 10, 72 N.J. 169, 1977 N.J. LEXIS 232 (N.J. 1977).
369 A.2d 10 (State v. Helton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Henry v. New Jersey Department of Human Services
9 A.3d 882 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 2010)
State v. Guerrero
557 A.2d 713 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1989)
State v. Miller
388 A.2d 993 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1978)
State v. O'Herron
380 A.2d 728 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1977)
State v. Helton
369 A.2d 10 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1975)