State v. Helton

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Helton

299 S.W.3d 339, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1805, 2009 WL 4932743

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 22, 2009·No. ED 92789·Published

Opinion

*340 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jackie Helton (“Defendant”) appeals from his conviction for first-degree robbery, Section 569.020 1 ; attempted first-degree robbery, Section 569.020; and two counts of armed criminal action, Section 571.015.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo.2000, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*340 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jackie Helton (“Defendant”) appeals from his conviction for first-degree robbery, Section 569.020 1 ; attempted first-degree robbery, Section 569.020; and two counts of armed criminal action, Section 571.015.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

1

. All statutory references are to RSMo.2000, unless otherwise indicated.

State v. Helton, 299 S.W.3d 339, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1805, 2009 WL 4932743 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

299 S.W.3d 339 (State v. Helton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.