State v. Helms

2011 Ohio 738, 128 Ohio St. 3d 352
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided February 22, 2011·No. 2010-1953·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The discretionary appeal is accepted.

{¶ 2} The discretionary cross-appeal is not accepted.

{¶ 3} The portion of the judgment of the court of appeals addressing appellant’s first assignment of error below is vacated on the authority of State v. Johnson, 128 Ohio St.3d 153, 2010-Ohio-6314, 942 N.E.2d 1061, and the cause is remanded to the court of appeals for application of our decision in State v. Johnson.

O’Connor, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Donnell, and McGee Brown, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., concurs but would also accept the cross-appeal on Proposition of Law No. II. Cupp, J., dissents and would not accept the appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Helms, 2011 Ohio 738, 128 Ohio St. 3d 352 (Ohio 2011).

2011 Ohio 738 (State v. Helms) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Potts
2016 Ohio 5555 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2016)
State v. Helms
2013 Ohio 5530 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2013)
State v. Gilbert
2013 Ohio 4783 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2013)