State v. Helm

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Helm

281 S.W.3d 927, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 542, 2009 WL 1122428

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided April 28, 2009·No. ED 91324·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eric Helm appeals his conviction and sentence after a jury found him guilty of four counts each of first-degree robbery and armed criminal action, and sentenced him to fifteen years imprisonment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eric Helm appeals his conviction and sentence after a jury found him guilty of four counts each of first-degree robbery and armed criminal action, and sentenced him to fifteen years imprisonment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Helm, 281 S.W.3d 927, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 542, 2009 WL 1122428 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

281 S.W.3d 927 (State v. Helm) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related