State v. Helm

281 S.W.3d 927, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 542, 2009 WL 1122428
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 28, 2009
DocketED 91324
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 281 S.W.3d 927 (State v. Helm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Helm, 281 S.W.3d 927, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 542, 2009 WL 1122428 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eric Helm appeals his conviction and sentence after a jury found him guilty of four counts each of first-degree robbery and armed criminal action, and sentenced him to fifteen years imprisonment. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.

The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Helm v. State
358 S.W.3d 586 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2012)
Bailey v. State
281 S.W.3d 927 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
281 S.W.3d 927, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 542, 2009 WL 1122428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-helm-moctapp-2009.