State v. HEITH
305 S.W.3d 505, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 342, 2010 WL 1027440
This text of 305 S.W.3d 505 (State v. HEITH) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
State v. HEITH, 305 S.W.3d 505, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 342, 2010 WL 1027440 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
Opinion
Order
Michael Heith appeals his conviction for deviate sexual assault after a trial by jury. Heith contends the circuit court erred in refusing his tendered non-MAI-CR cautionary instruction. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction.
AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
State v. Smith
305 S.W.3d 505 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
305 S.W.3d 505, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 342, 2010 WL 1027440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-heith-moctapp-2010.