State v. HEITH
305 S.W.3d 505, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 342, 2010 WL 1027440
Opinion
Order
Michael Heith appeals his conviction for deviate sexual assault after a trial by jury. Heith contends the circuit court erred in refusing his tendered non-MAI-CR cautionary instruction. For reasons explained in a Memorandum provided to the parties, we find no error and affirm the judgment of conviction.
AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. HEITH, 305 S.W.3d 505, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 342, 2010 WL 1027440 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
305 S.W.3d 505 (State v. HEITH) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Smith
305 S.W.3d 505 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)