State v. Heinrich
Opinion
FILED
IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT
MAY 30, 2023
STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2023 ND 102
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v.
Jeremy Wayne Heinrich, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20220339
Appeal from the District Court of Barnes County, Southeast Judicial District, the Honorable Jay A. Schmitz, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Tonya Duffy, State’s Attorney, Valley City, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Laura C. Ringsak, Bismarck, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief.
State v. Heinrich
No. 20220339
Per Curiam.
[¶1] Jeremy Wayne Heinrich appeals from a criminal judgment entered after a jury convicted him of one count of continuous sexual abuse of a child and two counts of promoting obscenity to minors. He argues the convictions are not supported by sufficient evidence. “In reviewing challenges to the sufficiency of the evidence on appeal, the defendant bears the burden of showing the evidence reveals no reasonable inference of guilt when viewed in the light most favorable to the verdict.” State v. Rai, 2019 ND 71, ¶ 13, 924 N.W.2d 410 (cleaned up). After reviewing the record, we conclude sufficient evidence exists for a jury to draw a reasonable inference Heinrich committed the charged offenses. We summarily affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(3).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J.
Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte Douglas A. Bahr
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
2023 ND 102 (State v. Heinrich) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.