State v. HEH

211 P.3d 982, 229 Or. App. 502
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedJuly 8, 2009
Docket300811980, A139356
StatusPublished

This text of 211 P.3d 982 (State v. HEH) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. HEH, 211 P.3d 982, 229 Or. App. 502 (Or. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

211 P.3d 982 (2009)
229 Or. App. 502

In the Matter of H.E.H., Alleged to be a Mentally Ill Person.
STATE of Oregon, Respondent,
v.
H.E.H., Appellant.

300811980, A139356.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Submitted on May 1, 2009.
Decided July 8, 2009.

James A. Palmer, Eugene, filed the brief for appellant.

John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Jerome Lidz, Solicitor General, and Justice J. Rillera, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before LANDAU, Presiding Judge, and SCHUMAN, Judge, and ORTEGA, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The trial court ordered that appellant be involuntarily committed because she is *983 mentally ill, specifically here, that she suffers from a mental disorder that makes her dangerous to others. ORS 426.005(1)(d). On appeal, appellant argues that there is insufficient evidence to support the order of involuntary commitment. The state concedes the insufficiency of the evidence. On de novo review, State v. O'Neill, 274 Or. 59, 61, 545 P.2d 97 (1976), we agree that the evidence is not clear and convincing that appellant is mentally ill on the alleged basis.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

O'Neill v. O'Neill
545 P.2d 97 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1976)
State v. H. E. H.
211 P.3d 982 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
211 P.3d 982, 229 Or. App. 502, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-heh-orctapp-2009.