State v. Hegwood

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Hegwood

438 S.W.3d 511, 2014 WL 4068137, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 868

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided August 19, 2014·No. No. ED 100094·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Quitman Hegwood appeals the trial court’s entry of judgment, following a jury trial of one count of Attempted Statutory Sodomy, section 566.062, R.S.Mo. (Cum.Supp.2007). We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with' a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant Quitman Hegwood appeals the trial court’s entry of judgment, following a jury trial of one count of Attempted Statutory Sodomy, section 566.062, R.S.Mo. (Cum.Supp.2007). We affirm the trial court’s judgment.

No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with' a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

State v. Hegwood, 438 S.W.3d 511, 2014 WL 4068137, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 868 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Pincite

438 S.W.3d 511 (State v. Hegwood) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.