State v. Heft

937 N.E.2d 1038, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1449
Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 1, 2010·No. 2010-1228·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Logan App. No. 8-10-05. Reported at 126 Ohio St.3d 1599, 2010-Ohio-4928, 935 N.E.2d 46. On motion for reconsideration. Motion granted to the following extent: Discretionary appeal accepted on Proposition of Law No. VII; cause held for the decision in 2010-1007 and 2010-1372, State v. Lester, Auglaize App. No. 2-10-20; and briefing schedule stayed.

Pfeifer, O’Connor, and Lanzinger, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Heft, 937 N.E.2d 1038, 127 Ohio St. 3d 1449 (Ohio 2010).

937 N.E.2d 1038 (State v. Heft) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Lester
2011 Ohio 5204 (Ohio Supreme Court, 2011)