State v. Heffernan

101 S.W. 618, 124 Mo. App. 329, 1907 Mo. App. LEXIS 218
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedApril 2, 1907
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 101 S.W. 618 (State v. Heffernan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Heffernan, 101 S.W. 618, 124 Mo. App. 329, 1907 Mo. App. LEXIS 218 (Mo. Ct. App. 1907).

Opinion

GOODE, J.

This defendant was convicted of exhibiting a deadly weapon in a rude, angry and threatening manner. The information was based on section 1862 of the Revised Statutes of 1899. Practically the only point made for a reversal of the judgment is that the evidence was insufficient to warrant a conviction. Defendant- and a man by the name of Darby were bartenders in a saloon in the city of Monett. At the time of the offense [330]*330Darby was on duty. Heffernan entered the saloon and got a pistol from behind the counter. He then asked for some whiskey and directed Darby to charge it to him, saying he had no money. Darby refused to- charge it and an altercation ensued, in the course of which Darby said he would put Heffernan out of the saloon, starting to do so when Heffernan began to shoot at him. Darby then got a pistol and shot several times at Heffernan, who ran out of the room. The evidence for the defendant tends to show that when Darby undertook to eject him, Darby had a wagon spoke in his hand, and that defendant used his pistol in self-defense. But the evidence for the State indicates that defendant got a pistol and then demanded that whiskey be furnished him on credit; that at the inception of the affray which followed Darby had no club or other weapon. It is certain the evidence for the State would warrant the jury in concluding that Hefferman aggressively and without provocation exhibited the pistol in a threatening manner and, indeed, used it when it was unnecessary to do so to defend himself.

The judgment is affirmed.

All concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Rinck
467 S.W.2d 897 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1971)
State v. Owen
457 S.W.2d 799 (Supreme Court of Missouri, 1970)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
101 S.W. 618, 124 Mo. App. 329, 1907 Mo. App. LEXIS 218, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-heffernan-moctapp-1907.