Home/Court of Appeals of North Carolina/State v. Hedrick

State v. Hedrick

167 S.E.2d 43, 4 N.C. App. 521, 1969 N.C. App. LEXIS 1545
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedApril 30, 1969
DocketNo. 6926SC211
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 167 S.E.2d 43 (State v. Hedrick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hedrick, 167 S.E.2d 43, 4 N.C. App. 521, 1969 N.C. App. LEXIS 1545 (N.C. Ct. App. 1969).

Opinion

Brock, J.

This appeal presents the face of the record proper for review. Counsel for defendant candidly and appropriately states that his examination of the record discloses no error; with this appraisal we agree. The record on appeal shows that the Court was properly organized and had jurisdiction, the indictment was valid in form, defendant was represented by counsel, defendant entered a plea of guilty to the third count in the bill, and the sentence imposed is within authorized limits.

No error.

Campbell and Morris, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Holden
168 S.E.2d 74 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
167 S.E.2d 43, 4 N.C. App. 521, 1969 N.C. App. LEXIS 1545, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hedrick-ncctapp-1969.