State v. Hedgecock
This text of 21 P.3d 137 (State v. Hedgecock) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this criminal case, defendant was found guilty except for insanity. The trial court, among other things, ordered defendant to pay court-appointed attorney fees and a unitary assessment. Defendant appeals, arguing that the statutes authorizing the courts to impose attorney fees and assessments apply only to “convictions” and that a finding of guilty except for insanity is not a conviction. The state concedes the point. We accept the concession. State v. Gile, 161 Or App 146, 985 P2d 199 (1999).
Portion of judgment requiring payment of court-appointed attorney fees and unitary assessment vacated; otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
21 P.3d 137, 173 Or. App. 216, 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 345, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hedgecock-orctapp-2001.