State v. Hedgecock

Court of Appeals of Oregon

State v. Hedgecock

21 P.3d 137, 173 Or. App. 216, 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 345

Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided March 21, 2001·No. 98-1101; CA A108133·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM

In this criminal case, defendant was found guilty except for insanity. The trial court, among other things, ordered defendant to pay court-appointed attorney fees and a unitary assessment. Defendant appeals, arguing that the statutes authorizing the courts to impose attorney fees and assessments apply only to “convictions” and that a finding of guilty except for insanity is not a conviction. The state concedes the point. We accept the concession. State v. Gile, 161 Or App 146, 985 P2d 199 (1999).

Portion of judgment requiring payment of court-appointed attorney fees and unitary assessment vacated; otherwise affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM

In this criminal case, defendant was found guilty except for insanity. The trial court, among other things, ordered defendant to pay court-appointed attorney fees and a unitary assessment. Defendant appeals, arguing that the statutes authorizing the courts to impose attorney fees and assessments apply only to “convictions” and that a finding of guilty except for insanity is not a conviction. The state concedes the point. We accept the concession. State v. Gile, 161 Or App 146, 985 P2d 199 (1999).

Portion of judgment requiring payment of court-appointed attorney fees and unitary assessment vacated; otherwise affirmed.

State v. Hedgecock, 21 P.3d 137, 173 Or. App. 216, 2001 Ore. App. LEXIS 345 (Or. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

21 P.3d 137 (State v. Hedgecock) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related