State v. Hedge

6 Ind. 330
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJune 6, 1855
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 6 Ind. 330 (State v. Hedge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hedge, 6 Ind. 330 (Ind. 1855).

Opinion

Stuart, J.

Indictment against Hedge for knowingly suffering his mare to run in what is commonly called a horse race, &c. The indictment was found in October, 1852. The time of the alleged offence is “the first day of August, in the year one thousand eight hundred and fiffcytooP The point of objection is to the orthography of the last word “too,” instead of “twoP It was argued that “too” is an adverb and not a numeral; therefore, inferentially, that this was an indictment laying the offence in August, 1850, and so on its face barred by the statute of limitations at the time of the finding. And of this opinion was the Court. So the motion was sustained and the indictment quashed.

The Court was clearly correct on the questions of grammar and orthography; but it is said that bad grammar, and, for the same reason, bad spelling, does not vitiate.

Per Curiam.

The judgment is reversed with costs. Cause remanded, &c.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bader v. State
94 N.E. 1009 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1911)
Miller v. State
7 N.E. 898 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1886)
State v. White
15 S.C. 381 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 Ind. 330, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hedge-ind-1855.