State v. Heavlin
This text of 52 N.W. 668 (State v. Heavlin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Iowa primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This cause is submitted on a transcript of the record which does not show any of the evidence submitted on the trial, nor the charge of the court to the jury. The only exception taken by thedefend-ant was to the overruling of a motion for a continuance, but the motion is not set out, and we have no means of judging of the correctness of the ruling. We have examined the record submitted to us with care, but do not find any ground for interfering with the judgment of the district court. It is therefore affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
52 N.W. 668, 85 Iowa 752, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-heavlin-iowa-1892.